|
Controversy
FAQ Interview Question 23
Do
you think that a large number of people have had what they would call
a negative experience in an ACCD training?
Maybe 3%
at the most. Probably less than that. It would be challenging to find
100 people that would say they had a negative experience. And that's out
of over 15,000.
In any education
enterprise, no one bats 1,000. Our commitment is to produce as much value
as possible with and for every person that we come in contact with in
our trainings. If we find out that we missed it with someone--in other
words, they went through the training and they found it was not a valuable
experience for them--we do everything we can to learn from that experience
by hearing what they have to say. We're completely open in supporting
them in any way possible after the fact to be able to walk out whatever
needs to be walked out, because we really believe that God's called us
to be reconciled with people. So if there's someone who has an offense
or a negative experience, without exception--it's organizational policy-we
walk it out with them. Through the years we've learned how to do our work
more and more effectively. As we've developed, we've learned by some of
our mistakes and we've learned how to more effectively be with people
when they've had concerns. We've tried to account for what needed to be
accounted for. We take responsibility for what we've missed with people,
because obviously we did miss something if they're still disgruntled,
and we want to take account for that and to learn from it.
There are different standards that can be used when thinking about positive
versus negative experiences in any environment-training, conference, church
service, et cetera. Once a pastor asked us this question about
participants having a negative experience in the training. We asked him,
"How many times has your church been sued?" He said three. I
said, "Well, we've never been sued." You go to CRI, one of our
detractors, and they've been embroiled in lawsuits from disgruntled people
who worked for them for many years. Many of the lawsuits were concerned
with plagiarism and other things because the organization stole other
people's intellectual property. We've had some upsets and they get published
on the internet, high profile, but out of the 15,000 graduates of our
trainings, the percentage of people who have been disgruntled has been
a very low percentage.
Some people might say the training was destructive, but then again very
quickly we could put together a thousand people who'll tell you it's in
the top three experiences of their life. It's not that we don't make mistakes
but that we learn from them. We're dedicated to people when they're upset,
and we follow through in ways that those who are concerned about us have
never even employed in their own realm. We've pursued those out there
that come up on the internet and say that they're disgruntled, for the
purpose of reconciliation. We've called them, talked to them, and have
often been turned down
they refused to talk to us or be reconciled.
The challenge, in our experience, has been actually getting someone who
publishes upset about us on the internet to sit down and talk about it.
Back
to Controversy FAQ
|